|
||||||
Views:
12,216,712 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
03-31-25 09:24 PM |
||||
Guest: Register | Login |
0 users currently in AcmlmBoard Developer Zone | 3 bots |
Main - AcmlmBoard Developer Zone - Acmlmboard Archive (2) |
Kak |
| ||
Global Moderator
![]() Bullet Bill well then Level: 131 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5475/5515 EXP: 26157949 Next: 266671 Since: 01-29-14 From: ??? Last post: 1176 days Last view: 1123 days |
The Acmlmboard ArchiveQ: Why this?A: Well, why not? It would be nice to have an archive of the past/present Acmlmboards out there for preservation purposes, especially since quite a bit of versions have since disappeared off the net, or were never released to begin with. As far as I'm aware, this has been attempted before many years ago, but no surviving archive still exists. Currently this archive covers the 1.x versions, as well an archive of the Acmlmboard Hacks people used to make back then. The entries are generally ordered by date from the oldest to newest, and with few exceptions provide:
![]() Special thanks to various people for their direct and indirect contributions to this project. TODO:
*for few versions I unfortunately couldn't provide the original untouched version. While the changes are incredibly minor, I marked them with a "_d" at the end of the file name. Hopefully I'll eventually be allowed to share the full unmodified versions. That said, the original versions are definitely getting preserved, just not publically. |
shan |
| ||
Normal User
Level: 110 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3746/4003 EXP: 14404650 Next: 4236 Since: 05-23-16 Last post: 578 days Last view: 577 days |
i assume all the security issues are as-is, correct?
this is really neat anyway though, lots of these versions I have never been able to find, and it's cool to see them all preserved |
Kaj |
| ||
Normal User
![]() Super Koopa Level: 58 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 658/842 EXP: 1525149 Next: 52397 Since: 07-31-14 Last post: 437 days Last view: 437 days |
are the 2.0x versions still a secret recipe? I haven't been keeping up with the shenanigans lately |
Kak |
| |||||
Global Moderator
![]() Bullet Bill well then Level: 131 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5476/5515 EXP: 26157949 Next: 266671 Since: 01-29-14 From: ??? Last post: 1176 days Last view: 1123 days |
|
Kaj |
| ||
Normal User
![]() Super Koopa Level: 58 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 660/842 EXP: 1525149 Next: 52397 Since: 07-31-14 Last post: 437 days Last view: 437 days |
I meant 2.0, 2.01 and such, not 2.1 and 2.5.x. |
Epele |
| ||
Site Administrator
The Sorceress. Boing~ Level: 238 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 20579/20774 EXP: 208262974 Next: 2790572 Since: 01-01-12 From: UK Last post: 1182 days Last view: 10 hours |
Posted by KajA lot of the 2.x series will not work on PHP 7+. The codebase has only recently been updated for 2.5.x to work on PHP 7, which in itself was a bit of a nightmare. A lot of the design for 2.x was very loose, and relied on code methods which don't work for PHP 7. At a core level, a lot of the 2.5 code can be traced back to its 2.0 roots.. as much of an insecure mess as that was. I know that much, as I have tinkered with the code back then. Honestly, the PHP7 support would be 2.6 if you asked me.. There was so much to clean and fix. The world could always use more heroes! |
Kak |
| |||||
Global Moderator
![]() Bullet Bill well then Level: 131 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5510/5515 EXP: 26157949 Next: 266671 Since: 01-29-14 From: ??? Last post: 1176 days Last view: 1123 days |
|
Main - AcmlmBoard Developer Zone - Acmlmboard Archive (2) |
Acmlmboard v2.5.6 (06/11/2024) © 2005-2025 Acmlm, Emuz, et al. |
MySQL - queries: 106, rows: 521/554, time: 0.584 seconds. |