Notings of Attention™
Acmlmboard 2 Released
Github/GIT | @acmlmboard
Chatting Places
Discord

Affiliates
Super Mario Bros. X | Kuribo64 | NeoRHDN
Views: 11,050,982
Main | FAQ | IRC chat | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Stats | Ranks | Online users | Search
11-23-24 10:12 PM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in AcmlmBoard II Software/Bug Report Forum | 1 bot

Main - AcmlmBoard II Software/Bug Report Forum - Old post's layouts
Next newer thread | Next older thread


knuck
Posted on 01-13-12 09:49 PM, in Link | ID: 2790
Normal User

Paragoomba

Level: 21


Posts: 35/73
EXP: 42797
Next: 7146

Since: 01-03-12

Last post: 4512 days
Last view: 4493 days
The old acmlmboard software would display the post layout used at the time of your post not the updated one. I suggest you give the option to see layouts based on post-time, not just the newest.

I'm not sure how posts and layouts are implemented in the database, but I know how to make this work without redundant data on the posts_text table (and I'm sure Bouche knows how to do it too).

I'd love to see this implemented~

Jet
Posted on 01-13-12 09:49 PM, in (rev. 2 of 01-13-12 09:50 PM by Jet) Link | ID: 2791
Banned
Unbanned indefinitely.
Level: 38


Posts: 250/295
EXP: 347676
Next: 22771

Since: 01-03-12
From: Scotland

Last post: 3786 days
Last view: 3786 days
It does make the post layout thread seem like a waste in terms of progression posts in its current state. >_>

Lili~ ♥
Posted on 01-13-12 09:50 PM, in Link | ID: 2792
Normal User
Queen Lesbian of Kafuka
Level: 160


Posts: 122/8412
EXP: 52923395
Next: 29604

Since: 01-06-12

Last post: 2965 days
Last view: 1488 days
Not sure if this is such a good idea. I mean yeah it has historical merit but once the host dies you see stuff like in the I1 archive. :/


Nicole
Posted on 01-13-12 09:52 PM, in Link | ID: 2793
Administrator
Goddess of the Apocalypse
Level: 200


Posts: 52/14042
EXP: 114172026
Next: 957363

Since: 01-03-12
From: Boston, MA

Last post: 469 days
Last view: 469 days
52 4707 51
The big issue I would see is the ABXD-style CSS... as those would get overwritten if I made a post with a different layout on the same page, which might be an issue especially for people using larger page limits...

Though it's probably not too important, as having two posts on the same page of a thread with different layouts, and the CSS interfering in a negative way, is probably not too common.


knuck
Posted on 01-13-12 09:53 PM, in Link | ID: 2794
Normal User

Paragoomba

Level: 21


Posts: 36/73
EXP: 42797
Next: 7146

Since: 01-03-12

Last post: 4512 days
Last view: 4493 days
I also want to have a strictly board-hosted layout, but since it's a big suggestion, I'll leave it for when/if I ever get to work on the code.

GreyMaria
Posted on 01-14-12 02:07 AM, in Link | ID: 2811
Normal User
~</3
Outta here.
Level: 99


Posts: 121/2758
EXP: 9939020
Next: 60980

Since: 01-03-12

Last post: 4152 days
Last view: 3941 days
Here's a thought: instead of relying on the board to store your layout code per-post, disable the post layout for a single post and manually implement it in your post body.

Nicole
Posted on 01-14-12 02:12 AM, in Link | ID: 2812
Administrator
Goddess of the Apocalypse
Level: 200


Posts: 54/14042
EXP: 114172026
Next: 957363

Since: 01-03-12
From: Boston, MA

Last post: 469 days
Last view: 469 days
54 4707 51
Posted by GreyMaria
Here's a thought: instead of relying on the board to store your layout code per-post, disable the post layout for a single post and manually implement it in your post body.

Of course, this has implications for anyone who might want to quote your post...


GreyMaria
Posted on 01-14-12 02:13 AM, in (rev. 2 of 01-14-12 02:14 AM by GreyMaria) Link | ID: 2813
Normal User
~</3
Outta here.
Level: 99


Posts: 122/2758
EXP: 9939020
Next: 60980

Since: 01-03-12

Last post: 4152 days
Last view: 3941 days
Posted by Nicole
Posted by GreyMaria
Here's a thought: instead of relying on the board to store your layout code per-post, disable the post layout for a single post and manually implement it in your post body.

Of course, this has implications for anyone who might want to quote your post...


Laziness killed the lazy bastard.

Besides, this plan's only intended for the layout thread, which is the only reason knuck's suggestion would ever serve any purpose.

knuck
Posted on 01-14-12 07:02 AM, in Link | ID: 2815
Normal User

Paragoomba

Level: 21


Posts: 37/73
EXP: 42797
Next: 7146

Since: 01-03-12

Last post: 4512 days
Last view: 4493 days
Posted by GreyMaria
which is the only reason knuck's suggestion would ever serve any purpose.
Uh, no. People mention layours/signatures often in post. But since it has changed to a newer one, a post mentioning an old layout will make no sense.

Kawa
Posted on 01-14-12 08:42 AM, in Link | ID: 2816
Retired Staff

Not okay
Prophet of Celestia
Level: 94


Posts: 142/2423
EXP: 8185430
Next: 171227

Since: 01-01-12
From: The Netherlands

Last post: 2240 days
Last view: 555 days
Really? What's next, persistant custom titles and avatars?


knuck
Posted on 01-14-12 03:54 PM, in Link | ID: 2859
Normal User

Paragoomba

Level: 21


Posts: 38/73
EXP: 42797
Next: 7146

Since: 01-03-12

Last post: 4512 days
Last view: 4493 days
Posted by Kawa
Really? What's next, persistant custom titles and avatars?
Neat idea!

Arisotura
Posted on 01-14-12 07:09 PM, in Link | ID: 2866
Developer
pancakes
Level: 84


Posts: 37/1870
EXP: 5547527
Next: 114425

Since: 01-05-12
From: France

Last post: 40 days
Last view: 40 days
Next great idea: when you edit a post, the new post gets added under the old post! :P

Seriously, I'm not in support of this feature. If users get lazy and just reuse their old layout's stylesheet instead of making a new one, the old layouts break rather badly. As it has already been said, same problem with hosts disappearing (see AB archives), and such a feature would conflict with the NN-style sidebars (old posts would have a mix of the old layout and new sidebars, which could look quite weird).

Technically speaking, it's also causing a lot of bloat, since a copy of the user's header and signature has to be stored with each and every post. To make it worse, there are post edits, which create new posts_text entries, a feature AB1 didn't have.

On an administration point of view, it'd also make removing offending layouts harder. With the current method, all that has to be done is edit the user's profile, et voila. With the AB1 method, you'd need to edit each and every post made with the offending layout (or modify the board to filter it out, like Xkeeper does).

____________________
Kuribo64 - melonDS

want some revolution in your coffee?

Acmlm
Posted on 01-14-12 10:12 PM, in Link | ID: 2877
Retired Staff

Red Goomba
Flipping paper plumber
Level: 15


Posts: 20/35
EXP: 14213
Next: 2171

Since: 12-30-11

Last post: 3868 days
Last view: 3866 days
My board kept the layouts with every post because I actually wanted it like that (auto-updating is simpler and was later added as an option), and I fixed the database bloat later (with a post layout table), but this was before most layouts used CSS and sidebar hacks :P


And my old board backup is still mostly readable with all the broken links >_> (some of them still work, too)

 
  Post: 20Level: 15EXP: 14213
  Days:  4712 -- 2171 for next
     
Rank
Currently on:

Red Goomba
#105

Emuz
Posted on 01-15-12 12:23 AM, in Link | ID: 2896
Site Administrator

11 Hit Combo:
Mother's Rosario
Level: 109


Posts: 261/3393
EXP: 13566964
Next: 392681

Since: 12-30-11
From: Akron, Ohio; USA

Last post: 116 days
Last view: 6 days
My concern with this relates to what ended up happening with I1. Mostly you'll run into images that are no longer stored anywhere. If you look at Acmlm's archive you'll see this clearly. The other big issue is, Bouche doesn't have unlimited space. Another issue was, if someone had a really bad layout.. in this case a broken css or something.. it would need to be cleared out by SQL query. All of these can be solved. Mostly with admin side tools, and a mode for everyone to toggle (current only, or at the time of posting)

I'd like to see what everyone else thinks as well.

The Dynamic Profile Administrator™


"Never Knows Best"
Note: if you can see this my layout broke. ALL THE CREDITS WILL BE REVEALED!!
'Victory Noriko' by @thatsheepagain.
'Chibi Dance Noriko' by @Haru__Kitsu.
'Deity's Night Out (Featuring Gabbie)'
by @thatsheepagain
Noriko Emotes by @Haru__Kitsu.
Side Bar Noriko by @thatsheepagain
'Noriko's Nature Walk' by @projectTiGER_
Emotive Noriko by @thatsheepagain.
"Space Candy Noriko" by BerryVerrine.
"Super Sharp Noriko" by Xionfes.
A gift illustration from the wonderful EverKinzPony!
"Magical Girl Noriko" by @cute_hospital!
"Patient Chibi Noriko" by @Ruii_ki!
'Dapper '60s Noriko' by @thatsheepagain.
'Shiny Chibi Noriko' by @inioli.
'Flower Veil Noriko' by @Sushiee_.
'Noriko in Realism' by @_Sarybuu.
'Noriko's Midnight Adventure' by @projectTiGER_
'Yukata Noriko' by @yunyunmaru_
'Birthday Wishes Noriko' by @thatsheepagain

Epele
Posted on 01-15-12 12:26 AM, in Link | ID: 2900
Site Administrator
The Sorceress.
Boing~

Level: 237


Posts: 175/20774
EXP: 205490198
Next: 2488736

Since: 01-01-12
From: UK

Last post: 1054 days
Last view: 9 hours
I find the "auto-updating" tends to prune out a lot of horror layouts. I'm not sure I'd see the benefit of it.

An alternative though: Store the layout connected to the user profile as a separate "revision". Skipping layouts not used for posting.

That way, if one is breaking the board or is horrific, it only takes one nuking. :)



The world could always use more heroes!

GreyMaria
Posted on 01-15-12 12:50 AM, in Link | ID: 2907
Normal User
~</3
Outta here.
Level: 99


Posts: 125/2758
EXP: 9939020
Next: 60980

Since: 01-03-12

Last post: 4152 days
Last view: 3941 days
While we're on the topic of layouts, though, I feel I should mention that knuck's is making the page stretch horizontally... without stretching any tables. What the fuck?

Jet
Posted on 01-15-12 01:03 PM, in Link | ID: 2959
Banned
Unbanned indefinitely.
Level: 38


Posts: 259/295
EXP: 347676
Next: 22771

Since: 01-03-12
From: Scotland

Last post: 3786 days
Last view: 3786 days
Knuck is a man who knows how to stretch the wrong things ;)

knuck
Posted on 01-15-12 02:54 PM, in (rev. 2 of 01-15-12 02:57 PM by knuck) Link | ID: 2970
Normal User

Paragoomba

Level: 21


Posts: 39/73
EXP: 42797
Next: 7146

Since: 01-03-12

Last post: 4512 days
Last view: 4493 days
Posted by Mega-Mario
Seriously, I'm not in support of this feature. If users get lazy and just reuse their old layout's stylesheet instead of making a new one, the old layouts break rather badly.
That never (or at least not often) happened before on 1.X versions.

Posted by Mega-Mario
and such a feature would conflict with the NN-style sidebars (old posts would have a mix of the old layout and new sidebars, which could look quite weird).

I don't really know what are those sidebars you speak of. I'm still with a 1.95 mindset.

Posted by Mega-Mario
Technically speaking, it's also causing a lot of bloat, since a copy of the user's header and signature has to be stored with each and every post. To make it worse, there are post edits, which create new posts_text entries, a feature AB1 didn't have.
You obviously don't know what you're talking about when it comes to the implementation of such a feature.

Posted by Mega-Mario
On an administration point of view, it'd also make removing offending layouts harder. With the current method, all that has to be done is edit the user's profile, et voila. With the AB1 method, you'd need to edit each and every post made with the offending layout (or modify the board to filter it out, like Xkeeper does).
You obviously don't know what you're talking about when it comes to the implementation of such a feature.

Posted by GreyMaria
While we're on the topic of layouts, though, I feel I should mention that knuck's is making the page stretch horizontally... without stretching any tables. What the fuck?
Fixed.

This feature makes the posts more consistent for readers in the future.

The ideal would to disallow any HTML tags on posts and add a WYSIWYG layout maker to edit profile (I know, it'd take time).


PS: This is intended as an option in edit profile, not to change the current behavior.

Jet
Posted on 01-15-12 02:57 PM, in Link | ID: 2972
Banned
Unbanned indefinitely.
Level: 38


Posts: 261/295
EXP: 347676
Next: 22771

Since: 01-03-12
From: Scotland

Last post: 3786 days
Last view: 3786 days
Kawa already had a WYSIWYG layout maker on his board.. Wouldn't be too hard to work on that and make it just attach to your profile rather than just outputting the css and html for you to copy paste..

Kawa
Posted on 01-15-12 02:58 PM, in Link | ID: 2973
Retired Staff

Not okay
Prophet of Celestia
Level: 94


Posts: 153/2423
EXP: 8185430
Next: 171227

Since: 01-01-12
From: The Netherlands

Last post: 2240 days
Last view: 555 days
Posted by knuck
That never (or at least not often) happened before on 1.X versions.
Bullshit. I've been through the archives just recently, and a lot of layouts are just plain broken, depending on where their component parts were stored.

I don't really know what are those sidebars you speak of. I'm still with a 1.95 mindset.
The sidebar is where your pony's at.
Posted by Jet
Kawa already had a WYSIWYG layout maker on his board.. Wouldn't be too hard to work on that and make it just attach to your profile rather than just outputting the css and html for you to copy paste..
That's what the Install button does, actually.


Next newer thread | Next older thread
Main - AcmlmBoard II Software/Bug Report Forum - Old post's layouts


Acmlmboard v2.5.6 (06/11/2024)
© 2005-2024 Acmlm, Emuz, et al.

Page rendered in 0.248 seconds. (859KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 208, rows: 612/644, time: 0.222 seconds.