|
||||||
Views:
13,706,566 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
07-03-25 12:56 PM |
||||
Guest: Register | Login |
0 users currently in AcmlmBoard II Software/Bug Report Forum | 1 guest | 1 bot |
Main - AcmlmBoard II Software/Bug Report Forum - thread title's size limit should be increased |
Lili~ ♥ |
| ||
Normal User
Queen Lesbian of Kafuka Level: 162 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 307/8412 EXP: 54155340 Next: 1135936 Since: 01-06-12 Last post: 3187 days Last view: 1710 days |
When you create a new thread, the thread title field has a really small limit so it's impossible to create thread names which are anything beyond super short. Amusingly, once the thread is created, the Rename link has a much higher limit (I haven't bothered to figure out how high it is) so you can immediately rename your thread and give it a long name this way.
I think the thread title field's size limit should be increased a bit. |
Kawa |
| ||
Retired Staff
![]() Not okay Prophet of Celestia Level: 95 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 458/2423 EXP: 8375785 Next: 292822 Since: 01-01-12 From: The Netherlands Last post: 2461 days Last view: 776 days |
Any absolute suggestions? |
Lili~ ♥ |
| ||
Normal User
Queen Lesbian of Kafuka Level: 162 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 309/8412 EXP: 54155340 Next: 1135936 Since: 01-06-12 Last post: 3187 days Last view: 1710 days |
Jul has a limit of 100, which seems pretty reasonable to me. The current limit of 60 we have is really too short. |
Kawa |
| ||
Retired Staff
![]() Not okay Prophet of Celestia Level: 95 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 459/2423 EXP: 8375785 Next: 292822 Since: 01-01-12 From: The Netherlands Last post: 2461 days Last view: 776 days |
The database field's length is 80 according to my testing copy. Good thing increasing that value (which I can't do) doesn't affect the thread titles we already have ![]() |
Main - AcmlmBoard II Software/Bug Report Forum - thread title's size limit should be increased |
Acmlmboard v2.5.6 (06/11/2024) © 2005-2025 Acmlm, Emuz, et al. |
MySQL - queries: 77, rows: 503/536, time: 0.034 seconds. |