Notings of Attention™
Acmlmboard 2 Released
Github/GIT | @acmlmboard
Chatting Places
Discord

Affiliates
Super Mario Bros. X | Kuribo64 | NeoRHDN
Views: 11,034,644
Main | FAQ | IRC chat | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Stats | Ranks | Online users | Search
11-22-24 11:15 AM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in Craziness Domain 二番: Kuchi Kopi's Bar | 3 guests | 24 bots

Main - Craziness Domain 二番: Kuchi Kopi's Bar - Installers
Next newer thread | Next older thread

Pages: 1 2

Lili~ ♥
Posted on 03-09-12 06:36 PM, in Link | ID: 8775
Normal User
Queen Lesbian of Kafuka
Level: 160


Posts: 629/8412
EXP: 52915205
Next: 37794

Since: 01-06-12

Last post: 2964 days
Last view: 1487 days
These are still written on every installer:

It is advised that you close all other Windows applications before continuing.

The installation may take several minutes.

Does anyone actually close other applications when installing something, because I definitely don't. And the "several minutes" part, when was the time where installing something took this long? :P


Kawa
Posted on 03-09-12 06:38 PM, in Link | ID: 8776
Retired Staff

Not okay
Prophet of Celestia
Level: 94


Posts: 937/2423
EXP: 8184164
Next: 172493

Since: 01-01-12
From: The Netherlands

Last post: 2238 days
Last view: 553 days
That's just because sometimes they might try to overwrite shared system files. Nowadays, that's hardly an issue for the average app, but the installers themselves, being off-the-shelf, still have the warning.


Nicole
Posted on 03-09-12 06:39 PM, in Link | ID: 8777
Administrator
Goddess of the Apocalypse
Level: 200


Posts: 327/14042
EXP: 114154367
Next: 975022

Since: 01-03-12
From: Boston, MA

Last post: 468 days
Last view: 468 days
327 4706 51
I never see that message on OS X. :)

*shot*


Kiyoshi
Posted on 03-09-12 07:02 PM, in Link | ID: 8780
Normal User
HEY HEY HEY STAY OUTTA MAH SHED
Level: 65


Posts: 666/1016
EXP: 2221961
Next: 113667

Since: 01-02-12

Last post: 4595 days
Last view: 4566 days
Posted by Nicole
I never see that message on OS X. :)

*shot*
That's because these are pre-built packages, and the system files are untouchable.
It avoids DLL hell but it makes the system more closed.

____________________
I don't give a flying feather

Kawa
Posted on 03-09-12 07:04 PM, in Link | ID: 8781
Retired Staff

Not okay
Prophet of Celestia
Level: 94


Posts: 938/2423
EXP: 8184164
Next: 172493

Since: 01-01-12
From: The Netherlands

Last post: 2238 days
Last view: 553 days
And even then, in Win7, installers only need elevation because Program Files is protected. As long as they don't try to change things in the system directories, you don't need to close shit.

The same "they're off-the-shelf" origin can be blamed for the time estimate.


Cynthia
Posted on 03-09-12 07:05 PM, in Link | ID: 8782
Normal User
Bot Without Panties
Unofficial board mascot
Level: 25


Posts: 66/115
EXP: 84563
Next: 5057

Since: 01-08-12

Last post: 3743 days
Last view: 2515 days

Kiyoshi
Posted on 03-09-12 08:11 PM, in Link | ID: 8783
Normal User
HEY HEY HEY STAY OUTTA MAH SHED
Level: 65


Posts: 667/1016
EXP: 2221961
Next: 113667

Since: 01-02-12

Last post: 4595 days
Last view: 4566 days
Posted by Comments
Posted by Cynthia
Relevant article.
But the real problem, of course, is the eternal tension between security and convenience.

Undeniably, the simplest possible interface for installing a downloadable app would be a web page with a button saying "Download and install ThisApp" which--when clicked--would handle the entire download and install process. You click on it, there's a slight delay, and the application is sitting in your applications folder (Mac) or Start Menu (Windows), ready to go.

Of course, if a known, responsible developer were capable of doing this, then a somewhat less reputable individual would be just as easily able to put the download-and-install code behind a button that said "CLICK HERE FOR HOT PIXXXX!!!!" and have it install any and all sorts of stuff you really never wanted on your computer.



____________________
I don't give a flying feather

Nicole
Posted on 03-09-12 08:18 PM, in Link | ID: 8784
Administrator
Goddess of the Apocalypse
Level: 200


Posts: 328/14042
EXP: 114154367
Next: 975022

Since: 01-03-12
From: Boston, MA

Last post: 468 days
Last view: 468 days
328 4706 51
Posted by Cynthia
Relevant article.

Dunno, honestly I disagree with the article- moving the file into Applications (which has a little bit of the sidebar in the Finder, which is usually awful but makes it very easy in this specific regard) is to me easier than sitting through a setup.exe (which may itself have come in a zip file!), and deleting it is about as easy as ejecting the "disk" and deleting it.

And having everything in a convenient folder is easier, though of course Kiyoshi notes that tradeoffs there. (But of course, winsxs takes up so much space now... are the benefits of more shared resources really there on Windows?)


Kiyoshi
Posted on 03-09-12 08:52 PM, in (rev. 2 of 03-09-12 08:55 PM by Kiyoshi) Link | ID: 8787
Normal User
HEY HEY HEY STAY OUTTA MAH SHED
Level: 65


Posts: 669/1016
EXP: 2221961
Next: 113667

Since: 01-02-12

Last post: 4595 days
Last view: 4566 days
Posted by Nicole
Posted by Cynthia
Relevant article.

Dunno, honestly I disagree with the article- moving the file into Applications (which has a little bit of the sidebar in the Finder, which is usually awful but makes it very easy in this specific regard) is to me easier than sitting through a setup.exe (which may itself have come in a zip file!), and deleting it is about as easy as ejecting the "disk" and deleting it.

And having everything in a convenient folder is easier, though of course Kiyoshi notes that tradeoffs there. (But of course, winsxs takes up so much space now... are the benefits of more shared resources really there on Windows?)
I remember installing Windows 98 on a 6.4 GB hard drive, and I always copied the contents of the win98 install folder off the CD to my hard drive, so I would not need the CD every time.
For XP it was still advisable to do the same with the I386 folder.
Vista and 7 leave copies of system files for you.
It's a trade-off between convenience and disk space. The latter is hardly an issue nowadays.

Edit: DLL hell was mostly solved in Windows XP, which always looks for a DLL first in the program path, before looking in the system folders.

____________________
I don't give a flying feather

Nicole
Posted on 03-09-12 08:53 PM, in Link | ID: 8788
Administrator
Goddess of the Apocalypse
Level: 200


Posts: 329/14042
EXP: 114154367
Next: 975022

Since: 01-03-12
From: Boston, MA

Last post: 468 days
Last view: 468 days
329 4706 51
Posted by Kiyoshi
I remember installing Windows 98 on a 6.4 GB hard drive, and I always copied the contents of the win98 install folder off the CD to my hard drive, so I would not need the CD every time.
For XP it was still advisable to do the same with the I386 folder.
Vista and 7 leave copies of system files for you.
It's a trade-off between convenience and disk space. The latter is hardly an issue nowadays.

And that's the same reason to just include your libraries in the application package rather than dumping them in system folders. *shrug*


Kawa
Posted on 03-09-12 08:55 PM, in Link | ID: 8789
Retired Staff

Not okay
Prophet of Celestia
Level: 94


Posts: 939/2423
EXP: 8184164
Next: 172493

Since: 01-01-12
From: The Netherlands

Last post: 2238 days
Last view: 553 days
Considering the working directory is the first place LoadLibrary'll look when you don't specify a path (which is the preferred style anyway)...


Kiyoshi
Posted on 03-09-12 08:57 PM, in Link | ID: 8790
Normal User
HEY HEY HEY STAY OUTTA MAH SHED
Level: 65


Posts: 670/1016
EXP: 2221961
Next: 113667

Since: 01-02-12

Last post: 4595 days
Last view: 4566 days
Posted by Nicole
Posted by Kiyoshi
I remember installing Windows 98 on a 6.4 GB hard drive, and I always copied the contents of the win98 install folder off the CD to my hard drive, so I would not need the CD every time.
For XP it was still advisable to do the same with the I386 folder.
Vista and 7 leave copies of system files for you.
It's a trade-off between convenience and disk space. The latter is hardly an issue nowadays.

And that's the same reason to just include your libraries in the application package rather than dumping them in system folders. *shrug*
Most programs do, but this still does not work for kernel-level libraries. For that, there is the compatibility mode fix.
And everything is solved if people just start using .NET :P

____________________
I don't give a flying feather

Kawa
Posted on 03-09-12 09:06 PM, in Link | ID: 8792
Retired Staff

Not okay
Prophet of Celestia
Level: 94


Posts: 940/2423
EXP: 8184164
Next: 172493

Since: 01-01-12
From: The Netherlands

Last post: 2238 days
Last view: 553 days
Preinstalled with recent Windowses, loader'll guide you halfway through an upgrade if you need one... but it can still require DLLs, unfortunately.


Kiyoshi
Posted on 03-09-12 09:12 PM, in Link | ID: 8793
Normal User
HEY HEY HEY STAY OUTTA MAH SHED
Level: 65


Posts: 672/1016
EXP: 2221961
Next: 113667

Since: 01-02-12

Last post: 4595 days
Last view: 4566 days
Also, there is no need to include KnownDLLs in installer packages.
Unlike what the Anti-MS communities say, this is not a security hole.

____________________
I don't give a flying feather

Ailure
Posted on 03-09-12 10:24 PM, in (rev. 2 of 03-09-12 10:24 PM by Ailure) Link | ID: 8795
Retired Staff

Buzzy Beetle
Red pandas and stuff
Level: 43


Posts: 181/398
EXP: 544839
Next: 20207

Since: 01-01-12

Last post: 2697 days
Last view: 899 days
If a installer really needs a certain application closed, it usually tells you which one anyway in my experience. I don't bother closing them all. :P

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org, YouTube



Arisotura
Posted on 03-09-12 11:07 PM, in Link | ID: 8798
Developer
pancakes
Level: 84


Posts: 163/1870
EXP: 5546669
Next: 115283

Since: 01-05-12
From: France

Last post: 38 days
Last view: 38 days
I don't bother doing anything other than what the installer forces me to do.

And I loathe it when they force me to reboot. I generally just ignore the message and try to use the newly installed program anyway. If the program misbehaves, I'll first try to restart explorer.exe, in some cases it's enough. But in other cases, I eventually end up having to reboot.

On a related note, who actually reads the End User License Agreement before accepting it? I don't.

____________________
Kuribo64 - melonDS

want some revolution in your coffee?

Epele
Posted on 03-09-12 11:57 PM, in Link | ID: 8804
Site Administrator
The Sorceress.
Boing~

Level: 237


Posts: 1128/20774
EXP: 205458428
Next: 2520506

Since: 01-01-12
From: UK

Last post: 1052 days
Last view: 7 hours
I scan-read the EULA to see if it's a copy-pasta or custom one.

I read the custom ones at least. :)

Also, I tend to not close anything. System Restore is a nice tool. ;)


The world could always use more heroes!

ゼンガー・ゾンボルト
Posted on 03-10-12 03:36 AM, in Link | ID: 8820
Normal User

Roy Koopa
My name is Sanger Zonvolt. I am the Sword that cleaves evil!
Level: 155


Posts: 355/7703
EXP: 46380561
Next: 1036659

Since: 01-04-12
From: Sweden

Last post: 1269 days
Last view: 1232 days
Posted by Liliana


Does anyone actually close other applications when installing something, because I definitely don't.


I only do that if the installer fails when I have something else running. It actually happened with something not too long ago.

And I rarely read the EULAs, if at all.

I hate having to restart the computer to complete installations, however.

____________________
There is nothing that can stand against my Zankantou!

My youtube channel
FFRK Brotherhood

Epele
Posted on 03-10-12 11:39 AM, in Link | ID: 8824
Site Administrator
The Sorceress.
Boing~

Level: 237


Posts: 1133/20774
EXP: 205458428
Next: 2520506

Since: 01-01-12
From: UK

Last post: 1052 days
Last view: 7 hours
Posted by Trapster
I hate having to restart the computer to complete installations, however.
Especially worse when it's a program that doesn't warrant a restart.

Some I can understand, but most I can't.


The world could always use more heroes!

GreyMaria
Posted on 03-10-12 07:25 PM, in Link | ID: 8830
Normal User
~</3
Outta here.
Level: 99


Posts: 726/2758
EXP: 9937483
Next: 62517

Since: 01-03-12

Last post: 4151 days
Last view: 3940 days
Launch MS Paint and scribble something in it before you run an installer.

Suddenly, it can't force you to restart.

And yes, I've seen installers that will restart your computer even if you click "no, I don't want to restart now". This stops them in their tracks.
Pages: 1 2


Next newer thread | Next older thread
Main - Craziness Domain 二番: Kuchi Kopi's Bar - Installers


Acmlmboard v2.5.6 (06/11/2024)
© 2005-2024 Acmlm, Emuz, et al.

Page rendered in 0.181 seconds. (864KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 206, rows: 640/672, time: 0.153 seconds.